Her Expanded Practice Involves Archival Projects > 자유게시판

• 목록
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Mindy Seu (b. 1991, California) is a designer and technologist primarily based in New York City. Her expanded apply entails archival tasks, techno-vital writing, performative lectures, design commissions, and shut collaborations. Her latest writing surveys feminist economies, historical precursors of the metaverse, and the materiality of the web. Mindy’s ongoing Cyberfeminism Index, which gathers three a long time of online activism and internet art, was commissioned by Rhizome, introduced at the brand new Museum, and awarded the Graham Foundation Grant. She has lectured internationally at cultural establishments (Barbican Centre, New Museum), academic establishments (Columbia University, Central Saint Martins), and mainstream platforms (Pornhub, SSENSE, Google), and been a resident at MacDowell, Sitterwerk Foundation, Pioneer Works, and Internet Archive. Her design commissions and session include initiatives for the Serpentine Gallery, Canadian Centre for Architecture, and MIT Media Lab. Her work has been featured in Frieze, Dazed, Gagosian Quarterly, Brooklyn Rail, i-D, and more. Mindy holds an M.Des. Harvard’s Graduate School of Design and a B.A. Design Media Arts from the University of California, Los Angeles. She is currently Assistant Professor at Rutgers Mason Gross School of the Arts and Critic at Yale School of Art.

Now, take a moment to watch some of the demo. I ask you, is that not a formidable thing? Does it not look pretty nice, even by today’s standards? By all measures, it was a technical marvel and a great user expertise. But it failed - bitterly. Bell Telephone’s plans for the PicturePhone were bold, if not outright delusional. The cost of a PicturePhone plan was $160/month. Today, flagship cell phones promote at around $one thousand a bit, but might you imagine paying that worth every month for service? That’s what $160 would have felt like in 1970. Bell arrange PicturePhone booths in New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. 20/minute to use them. When was the last time you dropped $150 in a vending machine? That’s the kind of expense we’re speaking about. As batshit as the economics of the PicturePhone were, Bell’s objective was to build a $1 Billion company - 100,000 PicturePhones in the first five years; 1,000,000 by 1980; 12,000,000 by 2000. Despite making an awesome piece of equipment and truly dazzling the technorati of the time by making it work properly over old, twisted copper wire, that was by no means going to occur.

Today, it’s simple to ask why Bell wouldn’t have simply subsidized the product in the early days to build the market. The answer is regulation. On the time, Bell owned many of the infrastructure - the network over which the PicturePhone was transmitting. Taking a loss on the device to lock in prospects would have triggered a massive antitrust case, and nicely, again then corporations actually cared about that kind of factor and so did the government. So, the PicturePhone was forced to be exorbitantly expensive. Though an financial misfit, the PicturePhone was a superb machine and a good higher catalyst. Researchers at Bell Labs knew that a digital future was at hand, and that new infrastructure would be required to support it. Several years before the PicturePhone was launched, Bell produced a movie representing their view of the future, known as Seeing the Digital Future, which anticipated a lot of today’s digital and web-pushed tradition.

Creating the PicturePhone allowed them to experiment with a number of the interactions they anticipated would turn into commonplace, while also demonstrating the need for upgraded infrastructure. name that porn Bell engineers have been in a position to ship a machine that transmitted stable sound and picture over existing telelphone lines was extraordinary. That they had been capable of create such a compact, desk-prepared device that was suitable with the telephones already sitting on them was additionally. That the PicturePhone had a digicam that used real glass optics and was refocusable and repositionable remotely makes me covet it, even now. Beyond those features, the PicturePhone released in 1970 anticipated a lot of today’s web experience. Fluid and frequent digital connections between people, absolutely, but in addition the multimedia nature of how we change data at present. Bell added video to what had been a wholly auditory connection expertise so far, however additionally they built add-ons to connect PicturePhone to mainframe computers, share slides over the screen, and even a mirror module that will enable the unit’s camera to broadcast documents you had in your desk.

Undeniably cool, although admittedly niche for the time. Bell hoped that gaining a country’s worth of subscribers would power a nationwide upgrade in digital infrastructure. As it might prove, even the internet, as we know it today, wouldn’t do that. We might have to distribute credit score for making the common American perceive the need for fiber optic cable among a various constituency - from Google to Pornhub. Pricing and infrastructure will be blamed for what would change into a $500 million loss for Bell Telephone. Even that quantity doesn’t really describe how much of a misfire the PicturePhone was compared with the truth that in the first 6 months, only 12 customers subscribed to the service, and by the time it was officially canceled, it had exactly zero of these customers left. But even in 1970, there were more than 12 people wealthy sufficient to be early adopters. So why didn’t they?